<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Strategic-Opacity on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/strategic-opacity/</link><description>Recent content in Strategic-Opacity on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 04:32:38 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/strategic-opacity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2026-10-18 「开源之道」·论文略读：战略不透明——当透明度与控制不再是反义词</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/dodds-liang-2026-strategic-opacity-2026-10-18/</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 04:32:38 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/dodds-liang-2026-strategic-opacity-2026-10-18/</guid><description>Tomás Dodds 与 Liang Chengyuan 在 The Information Society 发表《Strategic Opacity》，以 DeepSeek 与 OpenAI 的许可协议为对照样本，提出开源 AI 治理的三重位移：控制从算法层迁移到协议层、透明度与控制通过『战略性不透明』被重构为相容关系、监管框架与真实控制点系统性错位。核心判断：代码可见不等于治理透明，真正决定权利归属的是许可条款、平台规则与合规安排。</description></item></channel></rss>