<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Permissive-Washing on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/permissive-washing/</link><description>Recent content in Permissive-Washing on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 04:31:33 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/permissive-washing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2026-10-23 「开源之道」·论文略读：印着 MIT 的箱子，法律上是不是 MIT？——宽松许可标签与合规载荷的断裂</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/jewitt-hassan-2026-permissive-washing-ai-supply-chain-2026-10-23/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 04:31:33 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/jewitt-hassan-2026-permissive-washing-ai-supply-chain-2026-10-23/</guid><description>Jewitt、Rajbahadur、Li、Adams、Hassan（Queen&amp;#39;s University，KDD 2026）审计了 124,278 条 dataset→model→application 供应链，发现只有 2.3% 的宽松许可数据集和 3.2% 的宽松许可模型同时具备许可证全文与版权声明；而当上游真的齐备时，归属声明传到下游的比例只有 27.59%（dataset→model）与 5.75%（model→application）。结论一句话：宽松许可的标签不是可执行的授权，许可证文件与声明文本而非元数据，才是法律真相源。</description></item></channel></rss>