<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Open-Standards on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/open-standards/</link><description>Recent content in Open-Standards on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:32:39 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/open-standards/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2026-09-09 「开源之道」·论文略读：从开放标准到开放治理 — Otero &amp; Verhulst</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/otero-verhulst-2026-open-standards-openly-governed-2026-09-09/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:32:39 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/otero-verhulst-2026-open-standards-openly-governed-2026-09-09/</guid><description>Otero &amp;amp; Verhulst (2026, arXiv 2609.01773) 提出 4Ps 框架，把「开放标准」与「开放治理」拆成两个独立维度：规格的开放不等于治理的开放。这是大分流 2.0 中『行政式开源=开放标准+汲取治理组合』最锋利的学术命名——『internal governance cannot solve alone an external structural problem』是全文最锋利的句子，也是治理决定论最有力的学术反驳。</description></item></channel></rss>