<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Critical-Theory on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/critical-theory/</link><description>Recent content in Critical-Theory on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/critical-theory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>《Incorporating the Digital Commons: Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software》— Benjamin J. Birkinbine</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/birkinbine-2020-incorporating-digital-commons/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/birkinbine-2020-incorporating-digital-commons/</guid><description>Birkinbine 提出一个尖锐的问题：**当 FLOSS（自由/开源软件）最初作为专有软件的替代方案出现时，为什么它的产品和生产过程最终都被收编（incorporate）进了资本主义生产体系？**本书从批判政治经济学的视角，提出了一个四层收编框架：1. **产品层面的收编**：FLOSS 的产出（代码、软件）被纳入资本主义商品体系 2. **劳动层面的收编**：开源社区的自愿劳</description></item></channel></rss>