<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Bytedance-Doubao-Alibaba-Qwen-Custom-Agent-Withdrawal-July-2026 on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/bytedance-doubao-alibaba-qwen-custom-agent-withdrawal-july-2026/</link><description>Recent content in Bytedance-Doubao-Alibaba-Qwen-Custom-Agent-Withdrawal-July-2026 on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 01:33:55 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/bytedance-doubao-alibaba-qwen-custom-agent-withdrawal-july-2026/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>China Open Source Daily — 2026-10-06</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/10/2026-10-06/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 01:33:55 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/10/2026-10-06/</guid><description>Three institutionally dense placements on the same unsolved institutional object this series&amp;#39; prior forty-seven briefings have been documenting — the institutional identity of Chinese open source across institutional borders — and all three placements this cycle&amp;#39;s briefing documents sit at institutional layers this series&amp;#39; prior briefings have not documented at before. (1) The State Council Decree 841 Exit and Entry Administration Regulation (effective September 15, 2026) plus Bloomberg&amp;#39;s September 28, 2026 reporting that Chinese authorities have extended the exit-ban provisions to spouses, children and other family members of core AI and chip talent — documents the first-documented instrument-layer at which Chinese administrative law has converted the individual person of a Chinese AI/chip engineer from a labour-market-subject into a national-security-subject, at the State-Council-Decree-841-plus-MOFCom-plus-Countermeasures-List-plus-Unreliable-Entity-List-plus-Malicious-Entity-List-plus-Meta-Manus-Withdrawal-April-2026-plus-Chinese-AI-Talent-Strategic-Asset institutional layer. (2) President Donald Trump&amp;#39;s August 26, 2026 executive order banning foreign-made transformers, high-voltage circuit breakers and other grid equipment from China plus the September 25, 2026 US Senate bill barring federal agencies from buying Chinese optical transceivers for national security systems plus the Coalition for a Prosperous America&amp;#39;s 70-percent-optical-module-market figure plus Zhongji Innolight&amp;#39;s continued presence inside US data centers despite being added to the Department of Defense&amp;#39;s Chinese military companies list in June — documents the first-documented instance in this series of the AI-stack institutional border moving from chips and software to power infrastructure and data-movement hardware. (3) The TNW/SCMP reporting on ByteDance&amp;#39;s Doubao and Alibaba&amp;#39;s Qwen withdrawing user-created custom agents on July 10/15 in compliance with the July 15 Interim Measures for the Administration of AI Anthropomorphic Interaction Services, at a combined 549-million MAU scale (382 million Doubao + 167 million Qwen per QuestMobile May 2026) plus Tencent&amp;#39;s similar June Yuanbao withdrawal — documents the first-documented instance of a compliance sweep that withdraws more of the product surface than the regulation&amp;#39;s text requires, at the compliance-overshoot layer this series&amp;#39; prior briefings have not documented at before. All three placements sit at the institutional layer of Chinese open-source institutional movement that this cycle&amp;#39;s briefing documents but does not resolve — whether the Chinese-administrative-law apparatus is converging on a single-objectification of the AI-chip-talent-plus-power-infrastructure-plus-open-weight-model ecosystem as a unified national-security object, and whether the compliance-overshoot pattern this cycle&amp;#39;s briefing documents at the Doubao-plus-Qwen layer signals a broader Chinese-open-weight-lab compliance-posture that converts regulatory text into platform-level product-withdrawal behaviour.</description></item></channel></rss>