<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Pr-Issue-Ratio on The Way of Open Source</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/tags/pr-issue-ratio/</link><description>Recent content in Pr-Issue-Ratio on The Way of Open Source</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 01:32:12 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/tags/pr-issue-ratio/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>China Open Source Daily — 2026-09-16</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/09/2026-09-16/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 01:32:12 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/09/2026-09-16/</guid><description>&amp;#34;Four institutionally new placements on the Chinese open-source surface in the same week as this series&amp;#39; September 15 briefing documented GOSIM Shenzhen 2026&amp;#39;s 40-keynote-speaker lineup (Western-foundation-founder, EU-regulatory, US-hyperscaler-cloud, and Western-trust-economics surfaces placed together with Chinese vendor-official surfaces), the CSDN Harness Trust Axis paper, and RVOH&amp;#39;s follow-up analysis of MIIT Letter [2026] No. 209: (1) Huawei Open Source Official publishes on 2026-09-15 the first systematic Chinese open-source cultural definition (开源无国界 开发者有来处 / Open Source Has No Borders, Developers Have Origins, 18,212 characters / 175 lines) — the first-documented Chinese vendor-official cultural-definition surface in this series, pairing Linus Torvalds&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Just for Fun&amp;#39;, Peter Steinberger&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Fun is velocity&amp;#39; (the OpenClaw / &amp;#39;Clawdbot&amp;#39; rename episode as a shared institutional-memory object), DeepSeek&amp;#39;s MIT-license choice as a cultural posture, and the four-classical-Chinese values &amp;#39;立己达人 · 和而不同 · 知行合一 · 义利之辨&amp;#39; with a three-crossing institutional-form model (代码→项目→生态→业务 / code-to-project-to-ecosystem-to-business) and the four-mechanism diagnostic &amp;#39;interest brings speed / mission chooses direction / boundaries guarantee quality / institutions support longevity&amp;#39; — the first-documented Chinese vendor-official self-declaration that Chinese enterprise open source &amp;#39;may have institutions and processes but still lack vitality&amp;#39; without culture; (2) Xilai Tech (芯来科技 / Canaan Inc., RISC-V CPU IP) files for A-share IPO via Shanghai Futures and Exchange Bureau filing on 2026-09-11 (China Merchants Securities as coordinator) — the first-documented RISC-V commercial CPU IP A-share IPO filing in this series, with an institutional profile that pairs Xiaomi Changjiang Fund at 6.12% shareholding and VeriSilicon (芯原股份) at 2.99% shareholding (two state-aligned capital-market institutions), founder Hu Zhenbo at 14.97% (second-largest shareholder), national &amp;#39;little giant&amp;#39; designation upgraded to national key &amp;#39;little giant&amp;#39; in 2024-12, 2026 H1 revenue RMB 36.87M (+41%) against net loss RMB -57.30M, R&amp;amp;D spend 155% of revenue, four-business-line structure (RISC-V IP licensing at 92% of revenue, custom chip design, Chiplet products, server CPU not-yet-generating-revenue), and the explicit strategic positioning &amp;#39;the ARM version of China&amp;#39; / &amp;#39;RISC-V as the third pole&amp;#39;; (3) Ant Group Open Source Tech Committee chair Wang Xu publishes on 2026-09-15 the sharpest-documented quantitative evidence of Agent-Infra operationalizing in Chinese open source — Top-100 open-source repositories generated ~350,000 Issues and 610,000 PRs in the first eight months of 2026, the average PR-per-Issue ratio rising from 1.35 (January) to 2.11 (August), 92 of 100 repositories carrying AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md / .claude/ infrastructure files on their default branch, 98 of 100 repositories permitting any contributor to open a PR, PR backlog netting +43,000 entries in the same period, the median PR merge ratio declining from 77.0% to 68.4%, the 90-day-PR-still-open ratio rising from 5.5% to 11.3%, 143 Agent-Infra projects tracked and more than half of them born in 2025, and PyTorch plus ONNX Runtime already placing Agent collaboration rules into their default branches — a structurally new institutional-form observation of open-source governance being operationalized at the coding-agent layer simultaneously with the Western-foundation-conference-program layer documented in the September 15 briefing; (4) the same Ant Group data documents the sharpest quantified diagnostic of agent-productivity-driven open-source throughput collapse — &amp;#39;Agent productivity&amp;#39;s great expansion will ultimately elevate code collaboration to the convergence of ideas&amp;#39; — the first-documented Chinese-vendor-official institutional claim that open-source contribution at scale is transitioning from a code-collaboration object to an idea-convergence object, and the first-documented Chinese-vendor-official reading of the PR-merge-ratio collapse (77.0% → 68.4%) and the 90-day-PR-still-open rise (5.5% → 11.3%) as an institutional-mechanism problem rather than a code-quality problem. Institutional significance: the same Chinese open-source surface this series&amp;#39; prior twenty-six briefings have been documenting — the institutional identity of Chinese open source across institutional borders — is being operationalized simultaneously at three institutional surfaces this cycle (Chinese vendor-official cultural-definition surface, A-share capital-market institutionalization surface for RISC-V CPU IP, and Chinese-vendor-official quantitative-evidence surface for Agent-Infra) alongside the three institutional surfaces documented in the September 15 briefing (Western-foundation-conference-program surface, Chinese-analytical-framework-publication surface, Chinese-administrative-follow-up-analysis surface) — a six-surface-simultaneous-institutionalization pattern.&amp;#34;</description></item></channel></rss>