https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/tags/ai-policy/Recent content in Ai-Policy on The Way of Open SourceHugoenCopyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.Sun, 16 Aug 2026 01:32:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/08/2026-08-16/Sun, 16 Aug 2026 01:32:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/08/2026-08-16/Reuters via the Korea Economic Daily documents that People's Daily — the official mouthpiece of China's ruling Communist Party — has joined Moonshot AI's investor roster alongside a national AI fund, deepening the institutional-media-and-sovereign-capital penetration into a pre-IPO frontier-AI lab that was founded as a private venture thirteen months earlier; CEPA publishes 'AI Confusion: Washington Struggles to Respond to China' (August 13), an institutional critique arguing that the proposed U.S. ban on Chinese open-weight models rests on an unstated institutional premise — that China's open-weight models are structurally alien to the open-source commons — and that this premise is false; The Conversation publishes Christopher K. Tong's 'China is shaping the future of open-source technology — including AI' (August 12), the first academic article to frame Chinese open-source policy as a standards-setting project rather than a sovereignty narrative; Global Times publishes 'China advances global AI governance on all fronts' (August 14), formalizing the World AI Cooperation Organization's agenda as a standards-export vector rather than a diplomatic initiative; a preprint on SSRN — 'Cost-Driven Governance in Open-Source AI Innovation Commons: Comparative Evidence from Jittor and OpenHarmony in China' — advances the first formal academic model of cost-driven governance as an organizational logic of Chinese open source.